Week 02 · August 31–September 2

Build an evidence base.

Turn a broad environmental-policy concern into a tractable research question, then distinguish the evidence needed to study adoption, outcomes, and policy design.

Mon & Wed · 12:30–1:45 PM South 227B

Note

Office hours: Mondays and Wednesdays, 1:45–3:15 PM, in South 227B—immediately after class.

This week

Evidence and claims

  • Separate technical potential, observed adoption, and policy outcomes.
  • Match each proposed claim to an appropriate unit of observation.
  • Identify what the available data cannot establish.

Data transformation

  • Use a transparent dplyr pipeline to inspect, transform, and audit a table.
  • Preserve the meaning of rows, missing values, and denominators.
  • Record decisions that affect the interpretation of results.

Solar adoption

  • Frame solar adoption as a household, firm, or institutional decision.
  • Connect mechanisms such as incentives, costs, and constraints to variables.
  • Choose one bounded contribution to the shared research project.

Before class

  • Review your Question + Data Scan from Week 1.
  • Bring one source from the literature or a public agency that helps define your policy problem.
  • Reopen the greenhouse-gas data pipeline and note one decision that requires justification.

Lecture slides

Scroll to move through this Week page. Use the left and right controls shown in each preview to move through the slides.

Data transformation with dplyr Open full screen ↗

Solar Adoption Data: Measurement, Theory, and Research Design Open full screen ↗

Classwork

Classwork 1: Build and Audit a Greenhouse-Gas Change Pipeline

Use the classwork to practice keeping the research question, the pipeline, and the resulting claim aligned.

By the end of Week 2

Prepare a short evidence memo containing:

  1. one refined research question;
  2. two relevant literature or policy sources and the contribution of each;
  3. one proposed empirical claim and the variables needed to examine it; and
  4. one limitation that would change how the claim should be interpreted.

This is a formative working artifact that prepares the research-design work to come.

This week’s materials

Back to top